Be a tough consumer...
I suggest you spend it wisely...
"Home of rational investors for truth and justice, cutting through the noise and telling it like it is. Fact, opinion, market-moving events, with a smidge of scripture and philosophy, and perhaps even a lesson or two in economics. Visit our rules here. Don't agree with our rules? Please don't proceed. Don't understand our rules? Download your sign here."
| | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Weekly Wrap Trading in erratic fashion, the major averages finished the week higher, as relatively upbeat earnings for the third quarter overshadowed ongoing concerns about credit-related problems and the overall economy. Stocks rose on Monday, after last week's sharp sell-off, with bargain hunters picking up shares on the cheap, particularly in hard-hit areas such as homebuilders, banks, and retailers. Stronger than expected earnings from Dow component Merck & Co. (MRK) also helped fuel a recovery in the Dow Jones Industrials and the broader market. With upbeat earnings from Apple (AAPL) and blue chip companies DuPont (DD) and American Express (AXP), stocks rallied to close higher on Tuesday. The market struggled early in the session on fresh concerns about the consumer outlook, after discount retailer Target Corp. (TGT) lowered its October same store sales guidance and Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) cut its capital spending forecast for the year. However, led by enthusiasm for technology companies, stocks managed to end the session higher. On Wednesday, the market plunged due to more disappointing news on the housing front and a sharp third quarter loss posted by banking industry bellwether Merrill Lynch (MER), before rebounding late in the day. With the housing market still in a sharp downturn, the National Association of Realtors reported that existing home sales fell 8% in September to a low 5.04 million annual rate and median home price slipped 4.2% from a year ago. Expectations were for a 5.25 million annual rate. On the earnings front, Merrill Lynch reported a $2.3 billion loss in the third quarter and said it was taking a larger than expected write-down of $7.9 billion on its collateralized debt obligations and U.S. subprime mortgages. In other corporate news, Amazon.com (AMZN) reported higher earnings and revenue, but still failed to impress investors, who were concerned about shrinking margins. They pushed shares nearly 14% lower on the news. Dow component Boeing Co. (BA), meanwhile, surprised investors when it reported stronger than expected results and raised its outlook for the year. Despite a late-day rally, the market edged slightly lower on Thursday as reports on new home sales and durable goods orders, as well as a batch of mixed earnings, weighed on investor sentiment. The Commerce Department reported new home sales rose 4.8% in September from the August level. However, the latest figure showed an increased only because the last month's level of sales was revised sharply lower to a 735,000 annual rate from an originally reported 795,000. Meanwhile, it was reported that durable goods orders fell 1.7% in September, after a 5.2% decline in August, raising concerns about business spending. Finishing the week on a strong note, stocks traded higher on Friday as investors found solace from strong earnings from Microsoft (MSFT) and an optimistic outlook from Countrywide Financial (CFC), which sent its stock 32% higher. Microsoft for its part recorded a 23% increase in third quarter earnings, boosted by strong sales of Windows, Office, and the new Halo 3 video game. Shares of the software giant climbed more than 9% on the news and provided support for the overall market. Hurt by escalating mortgage defaults and recent credit market problems, Countrywide reported a $1.2 billion loss in the quarter. However, the nation's largest mortgage lender said it would turn a profit in the fourth quarter despite continued weakness in the housing market and elevated credit costs in near term. The outlook was reassuring for investors and prompted a short-covering rally in the stock. --Richard Jahnke, Briefing.com
|
Labels: Stock Market, Weekly, Wrap
By Adam Robinson and Edward Morse of Lehman Brothers
Published: October 24 2007 17:52 | Last updated: October 24 2007 17:52
After a generation on the sidelines, the US dollar has re-emerged as a central issue in the pricing of oil. Since the credit crunch in August, when the dollar has gone down, oil has gone up, by an average ratio of more than 5 to 1. Since August 21, the greenback has declined 4 per cent versus the euro; West Texas Intermediate crude, the global oil benchmark, meanwhile, is up 25 per cent.
Why are commodities traders fixated on the dollar? Like other oil market puzzles, the answer may lie in Saudi Arabia.
With a booming economy and inflation ticking higher, some speculators worry that Riyadh will de-peg its currency from the dollar. And they see such a step as having the effect of re-pricing oil in euros and yen.
That’s because if Saudi Arabia de-pegs and does nothing else, it will be sitting on two rapidly depreciating assets: $20,000bn in oil reserves and $800bn in US dollar reserves.
But if it were to diversify its currency reserves or oil pricing regime, then it is almost certain that the dollar would weaken. As a result, oil prices in dollar terms would have to jump to keep oil demand growth from Asia in check. For speculators with this mindset, oil at almost any price looks cheap, especially when the market is pricing in another dollar-weakening Fed cut this month.
Speculators do have it right that the US and Saudi business cycles are increasingly out of sync, and that it will become more difficult for Riyadh to maintain its currency peg to the dollar without exacerbating inflation. Inflation has crept higher, from 2.3 per cent in 2006 to an annualised 3.8 per cent this July.
But betting on a break in the peg may be premature. Inflation remains modest in comparison to Saudi Arabia’s neighbours, most of which have inflation in the vicinity of 10 per cent. Additionally, the components driving the jump in inflation – food and rents – are unlikely to be significantly affected by a shift in exchange rate regime, the former driven by global agricultural demand and the latter by the influx of foreign workers into the country.
Finally, Saudi Arabia will not want to jeopardise its FDI inflows (Like China, Saudi Arabia’s peg to a weak dollar makes it a cheap investment destination versus other emerging markets whose currencies have already appreciated). As a result, we expect any break with the currency peg would likely be measured and managed, with a relatively insignificant impact on the dollar.
While the Saudis may break their dollar peg as the US Fed eases monetary policy, they are unlikely to re-price oil in other currencies and break their “dollar alliance� with Washington.
Dating back to the aftermath of the oil crisis of 1973, the US negotiated the original alliance with the Saudis to assure petrodollar recycling. As oil prices have risen this decade, economists including ourselves have argued that the re-investing of oil export revenues into the US by Saudi Arabia and its neighbours has contributed to keeping interest rates low and equity valuations high. Often referred to as the “central banker� of oil, the Kingdom has proven on multiple occasions that it is focused on protecting a buoyant outlook for the global economy, as much to assure itself of a buyer as to preserve its political alliance with the United States. That usually means supplying enough oil to the market and holding spare capacity for use in the event of a disruption. Today, however, given mushrooming dollar reserves and the weakening US economy, it also means that Saudi Arabia must hold off on reserve diversification or doing anything that would initiate an attack on the dollar.
As risks to the Saudi economy increase, however, the Kingdom is not likely to stand idle. We don’t doubt that Riyadh’s increased leverage in Washington due to higher oil prices and a declining dollar will be put to at least subtle use. It is difficult to imagine exactly how that leverage over Washington will manifest itself, but it may include higher technology weapons at greater discounts or higher consideration of Riyadh’s concerns in other areas, including regional security. Thus, while we may actually never witness the Kingdom using its enhanced leverage, the fact that speculators perceive it to exist may push up the price of oil.
Adam Robinson is an energy research analyst at Lehman Brothers. This piece was co-authored by Edward Morse, chief energy economist.
Despite their sluggish start, the major averages finished the week higher thanks to the Federal Reserve's decision to lower interest rates to help shield the economy from the housing slowdown and turmoil in the financial markets.
U.S. stocks began the week lower, led by declines in the financial sector, as growing problems at Britain's Northern Rock exacerbated fears that problems in the credit market are spreading. According to a report last Friday, the Bank of England had provided emergency funding to the beleaguered mortgage lender, which prompted a rush of customers to withdraw their deposits.
Stocks bounced back strongly on Tuesday, however, after the FOMC lowered its key fed funds rate by 50 basis points to 4.75% in a unanimous decision to help boost economic growth and allay growing fears about a possible recession. The Fed also cut its discount rate by the same amount to 5.25%.
August PPI, meanwhile, fell 1.4% on a large decline in oil prices. Core-PPI rose a modest 0.2%. The overall drop was larger than expected, but the core was in line with expectations. The data did not have much market impact, though, given the focus on the Fed's policy announcement.
Also lending some support to the market was a better than expected report from Lehman Brothers (LEH) - the first investment bank to report third quarter results and to provide a look into the extent of the damage from the fallout in the subprime mortgage market and credit tightening.
Stocks, which were still gleaming from the Fed's policy move, extended their rally on Wednesday. Interest rate-sensitive areas such as housing and financials were some of the biggest gainers, despite a lackluster report from Morgan Stanley (MS). The investment bank reported quarterly earnings well below analysts' estimate, as significant trading losses in quant strategies and fixed income sales and trading weighed on overall results.
Meanwhile, a muted reading on consumer prices also supported the market's gain, and offset poor data on New Home Starts and Building Permits, which fell to their lowest level in 12 years in August.
Ending two days of gains, stocks reversed course on Thursday due partly to higher oil prices and a mixed batch of earnings reports.
Goldman Sachs (GS) exceeded expectations with broad-based revenue strength, while Bear Stearns (BSC) reported a significant miss due to challenges in the credit markets. FedEx Corp. (FDX) posted better than expected results, but provided a bleak outlook for the full year due to a tepid economic environment.
A rise in oil prices to more than $83 per barrel kindled concerns about inflationary pressures and also contributed to the market's pullback.
Strong earnings from software maker Oracle Corp. (ORCL) and footwear company Nike (NKE) after the close Thursday provided the market some support going into Friday and helped further the week's gains. The earnings reports were seen as an encouraging sign that many companies are still doing well, despite the recent problems in the financial markets and a more challenging consumer environment.
--Richard Jahnke, Briefing.com
| Index | Started Week | Ended Week | Change | % Change | YTD |
| DJIA | 13442.52 | 13820.19 | 377.67 | 2.8 % | 10.9 % |
| Nasdaq | 2602.18 | 2671.22 | 69.04 | 2.7 % | 10.6 % |
| S&P 500 | 1484.25 | 1525.75 | 41.50 | 2.8 % | 7.6 % |
| Russell 2000 | 783.49 | 813.11 | 29.62 | 3.8 % | 3.2 % |
| By Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, International Business Editor Last Updated: 8:39am BST 20/09/2007 Saudi Arabia has refused to cut interest rates in lockstep with the US Federal Reserve for the first time, signalling that the oil-rich Gulf kingdom is preparing to break the dollar currency peg in a move that risks setting off a stampede out of the dollar across the Middle East. |

Labels: banking crisis, deflation, depression, fed funds, inflation
These people are waiting to pull their money out of Northern Rock. Fraction reserve banking relies on confidence, which in a panic disappears like a puff of smoke.The stock market spent most of this past week talking about what will happen next week. That didn't prevent a more upbeat underlying tone from developing. The indices showed good resilience all week and the only day the S&P was down was on Monday, and then by just two points.
The top focus remains the Fed policy meeting on Tuesday. There remains much debate as to whether the Fed will cut the fed funds rate by 1/4% or by 1/2%. This is despite the fact that recent statements from Fed officials have tended to stress economic strengths and reflect no sign of panic. There is a distinct possibility that the statement and Fed action could disappoint the stock market.
That is, at least in theory. It is also noteworthy that the stock market has tended to move higher after recent policy statements, even when they were disappointing. The stock market rise this week may be based as much on the belief that the risks of the Wall Street liquidity problems turning into a full-blown credit crunch are diminishing over time.
It was a light week for corporate news. Intel raised its current quarter revenue guidance on Monday. Surprisingly, that had little broad impact even though worldwide demand for semiconductors is obviously a good economic sign. Then on Tuesday, McDonald's announced strong August sales. Big Macs had more impact than chips as that news helped fuel a 20 point gain in the S&P 500 index.
McDonald's gave the market another boost when it announced after the close on Wednesday that it was increasing its dividend by 50%. That, along with a dividend increase from Microsoft, helped the S&P gain 12 points on Thursday.
Without news from McDonald's, the market was flat on Monday, Wednesday, and Friday. On Friday the only economic reports of note were released. August retail sales were up 0.3%. That was a bit less than the expected 0.5% increase, but the July gain was revised upward from 0.3% to 0.5%. August industrial production was reported up 0.2%. This was a tad less then an expected 0.3% increase, but July on this time series was also revised higher, from +0.3% to +0.5%. These two releases reflect sluggish economic growth, but not recession.
Other key news this week was that OPEC raised their production ceiling by 500,000 barrels a day. That didn't help keep oil prices down, as oil closed at $79.10 a barrel after briefly breaching $80.
The 10-year note yield rose from 4.37% last week to close this week at 4.46%.
It was a good week for the stock market. Sentiment seemed to improve. Whether these gains are sustainable,however, depends on the reaction to the Fed statement Tuesday. A very volatile market reaction is very possible.
| Index | Started Week | Ended Week | Change | % Change | YTD |
| DJIA | 13113.38 | 13442.52 | 329.14 | 2.5 % | 7.9 % |
| Nasdaq | 2565.7 | 2602.18 | 36.48 | 1.4 % | 7.7 % |
| S&P 500 | 1453.55 | 1484.25 | 30.70 | 2.1 % | 4.6 % |
| Russell 2000 | 775.78 | 783.49 | 7.71 | 1.0 % | -0.5 % |
By Craig Torres
Sept. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Alan Greenspan trusted his instincts. Ben Bernanke trusts the MAQS.
For the past several days, the MAQS -- a group of analysts in the Federal Reserve's Macroeconomic and Quantitative Studies unit -- have run a series of what-if scenarios on the U.S. economy that will play a critical role in next week's interest- rate decision.
The simulations will supplement the forecast handed to policy makers at the start of their Sept. 18 meeting and may determine the size of the rate cut almost universally predicted by Wall Street economists.
Bernanke has championed the team's work since becoming Fed chairman in 2006 because he wants to sift through models, projections and anecdotes before coming to conclusions. His approach contrasts with that of predecessor Alan Greenspan, who relied more on his own reading of conditions -- and as a result probably would have cut rates to insure against a recession long before the Sept. 18 Federal Open Market Committee gathering.
``Greenspan emphasized that, in response to a low- probability but high-cost outcome, the Fed should move aggressively,'' said Mickey Levy, chief economist at Bank of America Corp. in New York. ``This Fed under Bernanke is more disciplined.''
The FOMC will next week lower the overnight lending rate between banks to 5 percent from 5.25 percent, according to the median forecast of economists surveyed by Bloomberg News. The reduction would be Bernanke's first and may be followed by at least two more before year-end, federal funds futures suggest.
Greenspan said Bernanke is doing ``an excellent job,'' according to excerpts from a CBS interview scheduled to air on the 60 Minutes program Sept. 16, a day before the publication of the former chairman's book, ``The Age of Turbulence.'' He added that he had ``no notion'' of the threat subprime lending posed to the overall economy ``until very late in 2005 and 2006,'' according to excerpts e-mailed by CBS today.
Subprime Reverberations
Calls for lower borrowing costs have been mounting since early August as the collapse of the subprime-mortgage market suddenly raised the cost of credit for companies and consumers. Pressure on Bernanke increased even more after a Labor Department report on Sept. 7 showed employers got rid of workers last month for the first time in four years.
Rather than resort to an emergency cut in the federal funds rate, Bernanke, 53, has waited for more data and a careful study of all the scenarios now under preparation by the staff.
The MAQS are in charge of the quantitative model of the U.S. economy known as FRB/US or ``Ferbus.'' By adjusting for such things as higher financing rates for American companies or a sharp decline in home prices, the team provides policy makers a glimpse of possible outcomes.
Staff Playbook
The scenarios -- known at the Fed as ``alt sims'' or alternative simulations -- are especially important at next week's meeting because the vote will likely be cast on the dangers that the forecast is better or worse than reported, former Fed officials said.
``The FOMC will start by looking at the standard calculation'' of how changes in home prices and credit spreads affect the outlook for employment and inflation, said Douglas Elmendorf, an assistant director of the Federal Reserve Board's research and statistics division from 2004 to 2007.
Policy makers will then ask, ```Where do we see the risks arrayed around the baseline?''' said Elmendorf, now a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution in Washington. ``Alternative simulations are quite important, particularly because of the Fed's announced interest in risk management.''
The methodical approach has some pining for the good old rapid-response days of Greenspan, who called six emergency rate meetings between 1992 and 2001. Five of those resulted in reductions as he sought to head off recession or ease gridlock in capital markets.
`Slow to Acknowledge'
Under Bernanke, ``the Federal Reserve has been very slow to acknowledge what is one of the biggest busts in U.S. housing history,'' said Allen Sinai, president of Decision Economics Inc. in New York. ``They've never even called it a recession.''
The distinction between Bernanke and Greenspan, 81, has roots in their different resumes and competing views about managing risk and uncertainty. Greenspan was a business economist before he became Fed chairman in 1987 -- one of his offices was on Wall Street -- and he read the economy like an income statement. His decisions were often based on close readings of disparate data, and his methods defied quantification. Greenspan's memoirs of his years at the Fed will be released on Sept. 17, the eve of the rate decision.
Bernanke, a former head of the economics department at Princeton University, has spent most of his career in academia. His analysis is based on models, and he has greater confidence in forecasts and statistical methods.
Snap Judgments
Over time, Greenspan's ``confidence in making snap judgments on less convincing evidence increased,'' said Ethan Harris, chief U.S. economist at Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. in New York. ``Bernanke has a more balanced approach to decision making, which means you combine business-economist skills with anecdotes, high-frequency indicators, with models and simulation exercises.''
Both approaches have risks. Greenspan cited uncertainty as ``the defining characteristic'' of the monetary policy landscape in an August 2003 speech. ``Only a limited number of risks can be quantified with any confidence,'' he said.
The speech was critical of models, and elevated the role of judgment. He invoked theories of Frank Knight, a University of Chicago economist from 1927 to 1955, to explain his ideas of risk management.
Knight distinguished between risk and uncertainty: Risk is quantifiable, uncertainty is random. Managers ``would try to turn those uncertainties into knowable costs,'' said Ross Emmett, a professor at James Madison College at Michigan State who has edited a collection of Knight's essays. ``They would purchase insurance.''
Greenspan's Preference
Greenspan's preference for insurance was most visible in the third rate cut of 1998, and the aggressive easing from 2001 to 2003 to offset a ``minor'' probability of deflation.
Both those moves have been reassessed by Fed officials and private economists, who acknowledge that the rate cuts were too aggressive. To use Greenspan's framework, the Fed ``overpaid'' for insurance against risks that turned out to be less severe.
``We did use the fed funds rate, and that may have been a mistake,'' former Fed Vice Chairman Alice Rivlin, who voted for the 1998 rate cuts, said in an interview last month. Referring to the Bernanke Fed, she added: ``It might have been smarter to try what they are trying.''
The third cut of 1998 took the federal funds rate to 4.75 percent in a quarter when the economy grew at a 6.2 percent annual rate, according to revised data. In 1999, the Nasdaq Composite Index surged 86 percent, only to lose 39 percent the following year, and another 21 percent in 2001.
Bernanke's Vote
Bernanke, as a Fed governor, voted to keep the federal funds rate below consumer-price inflation for three years from 2002 to 2004. The result was a different bubble -- housing -- fueled by the biggest mortgage binge on record. Americans borrowed $2.8 trillion in home loans between 2004 and 2006.
``It was the Fed's own lax monetary policy that permitted the problem to arise,'' said Anna Schwartz, co-author of the 1963 book ``A Monetary History of the United States, 1867-1963'' with Nobel laureate Milton Friedman. ``The responsibility is right at the door of the Federal Reserve.''
Statistical modelers such as Bernanke have their own icon to draw on: the 18th century British mathematician and Presbyterian minister Thomas Bayes. Unlike Knight's apostles, Bayesians are more likely to quantify uncertainty by deriving probabilities. There is also a role for constant updating with new information to hone a forecast. Bayesian theory is used in hurricane tracking, for example.
Speeches suggest that members of the current FOMC are aware of the danger of overpaying for insurance again.
``Conditions can change quickly for better or for worse, especially in financial markets, so it's hard right now to speak with a great deal of confidence about future economic developments,'' San Francisco Fed President Janet Yellen said Sept. 10.
``A good example is the aftermath of the Russian debt default in 1998,'' she said. ``Many forecasters predicted a sharp economic slowdown as a result, but instead, growth turned out to be robust.''
To contact the reporter on this story: Craig Torres in Washington at Ctorres3@bloomberg.net
By Mark Gilbert
Sept. 13 (Bloomberg) -- Call it deja-vu all over again.
``A further important cause for alarm was the danger that the troubles, if not solved, would be transmitted through a domino effect to the many other secondary banks which, with much vulnerable short-term borrowing and many assets tied up in the increasingly troubled property industry, were themselves showing signs of being at risk in the harsher new economic environment.''
Sounds like an apt, if somewhat wordy, description of the current money-market crisis prompted by the collapse of the U.S. subprime mortgage market, doesn't it?
Instead, the passage is lifted from ``The Secondary Banking Crisis, 1973-75'' by Margaret Reid. The book describes how the collapse of a U.K. mortgage lender called Cedar Holdings triggered a crisis of confidence in the banking system, requiring a Bank of England bailout.
Many of the similarities between today's financial environment and the one prevailing more than three decades ago are striking -- except for the part where the central bank rides to the rescue by strong-arming a posse into action.
Banking is essentially a confidence trick. Depositors have to be confident they can draw freely from their accounts. Retailers have to be confident swiping a rectangle of plastic in exchange for goods and services will produce a balance transfer in their favor.
And the banks themselves have to be confident they and their peers have sufficient assets to meet their liabilities.
Party's Over
For now, that confidence has evaporated as hedge funds and structured investment vehicles and conduits -- spawned while the credit-market party was hopping -- come knocking at the door for handouts because the music has stopped. And thus, the banking community wants the central banks to soothe its hangover and refill the punchbowl by cutting official interest rates.
It's far from certain that lower central-bank rates would unfreeze the money markets. Moreover, central bankers are probably willing to sacrifice smaller lenders so the pain is enough to make financiers more cautious about future investments, provided there's no threat to general stability.
The U.S. Federal Reserve and the European Central Bank have held special auctions to grease the wheels of commerce with extra cash. They have succeeded in driving the overnight rate for dollars down to about 5.18 percent from as high as 5.96 percent and its euro counterpart to 4.15 percent from 4.69 percent. Three-month rates, though, are stuck at a seven-year high of 5.7 percent for dollars and a six-year high of 4.82 percent for euros.
Difference of Opinion
The Bank of England, by contrast, has been adamant that it won't rescue the money markets by accepting low-grade collateral, or by offering three-month cash. Indeed, the Fed and the ECB were rebuked yesterday, albeit obliquely, by U.K. central bank Governor Mervyn King for bailing out commercial banks.
``The provision of such liquidity support undermines the efficient pricing of risk by providing ex post insurance for risky behavior,'' King said in a copy of testimony he plans to deliver to the U.K. Parliament's Treasury Committee on Sept. 20. ``That encourages excessive risk-taking, and sows the seeds of a future financial crisis.''
Victoria Mortgage Funding Ltd., a U.K. company that lent about 300 million pounds ($609 million) in subprime mortgages to British borrowers, was placed into administration earlier this week, the U.K. equivalent of Chapter 11. Victoria couldn't secure enough funding to stay in business.
That's what should befall financial institutions that ignore the risk of a funding deficit and ``have borrowed short to lend long,'' as King put it in his testimony. A central bank chief, though, would never be allowed to voice that axiom.
No Lifeboat
King sounds determined to take advantage of the current contagion to try to extinguish the notion of a ``Greenspan put'' or ``Bernanke put,'' the idea that central banks will always ride to the rescue.
The U.K. central-bank chief said helping commercial banks salvage their ``risky or reckless lending'' is especially dangerous because it ``encourages the view that as long as a bank takes the same sort of risks that other banks are taking then it is more likely that their liquidity problems will be insured ex post by the central bank.''
The ECB has already blinked, by keeping monetary policy on hold last week. Traders and investors are betting the Fed will also blanch, with futures and options prices suggesting almost a 90 percent chance of a U.S. rate cut next week.
Memory Bank
The Bank of England's approach may be informed by its experience in underwriting the salvage operation that kept the U.K. financial system afloat more than 30 years ago. In her 1982 book on the crisis, Reid cites an unidentified commercial banker suggesting the big institutions did too much.
``If we had from the outset allowed two or three of the least respected names to collapse in a flurry of publicity with losses to their depositors, it would have served them right and would have acted like a quick piece of surgery on the City, cutting out the canker and enabling the rest of us to continue the more easily with our normal business,'' the banker said.
The correct number of banks to fail when a credit bubble bursts is not zero. If the best way to avoid the mispricing of risk in future is to sacrifice some of the less-prudent lenders on the altar of liquidity, then let the culling commence. That is especially the case if it erases the perception that central banks will always act as lenders of last resort, even to institutions that don't deserve to survive.
To contact the writer of this column: Mark Gilbert in London at magilbert@bloomberg.net
Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson said the U.S. economy would be hurt by the upheaval but the overall outlook remained benign.
"There will be a penalty but the backdrop of the strength of the economy, the corporations, the institutions, is such that we are resilient," Paulson told the Times newspaper.
The ECB's monthly bulletin said global economic activity remained robust, supported mainly by buoyant emerging economies.
But it added: "While the global repercussions of the U.S. economic slowdown have so far been limited, it remains to be seen whether the recent financial market turmoil will lead to a lasting reappraisal of global financial market risks and a loss in confidence with possible implications for the real economy."
Barring costly mistakes, simply shopping around, getting the right amount of coverage and implementing a few strategies can save you hundreds or even thousands of dollars.
Kimberly Lankford, author of "The Insurance Maze: How You Can Save Money on Insurance -- and Still Get the Coverage You Need," reveals concrete steps you can take to cut insurance costs...
After starting the holiday-shortened week on a strong note, U.S. stocks finished the week lower amid growing concerns that problems in the housing and credit markets are spreading to the job market and weighing on the overall economy.
The stock market rallied on Tuesday - the first day of trading after Monday's Labor Day holiday - with all three major indexes rising more than 1%, after a report from the Institute for Supply Management showed manufacturing activity expanded in August. The ISM index national survey on manufacturing conditions dipped to 52.9 last month from 53.8 in July. That was slightly below expectations, but remained steady at a level that reflects moderate growth.
Meanwhile, favorable reports on Apple (AAPL) and Yahoo! (YHOO) helped boost the Technology sector and the tech-heavy Nasdaq index, which jumped 47 points, or 1.81%, during the session.
Stocks retraced their gains on Wednesday, however, due to further signs of weakness in the U.S. housing market. The market's concerns about the health of the economy were exacerbated by the National Association of Realtors' Pending Home Sales report, which showed pending sales of previously owned homes fell by a record 12.2% in July to its lowest level in six years.
Also, Costco (COST) reported disappointing same store sales results for August, reflecting increasing pressure on U.S. consumers and further weighing on investor sentiment.
Stocks reversed course on Thursday, as weekly jobless claims and second quarter productivity and unit labor costs came in stronger than expected. Meanwhile, several retail chains, including Wal-Mart Stores (WMT) and Target Corp. (TGT), reported monthly sales figures that topped analysts' expectations, and the ISM Services index held steady at 55.8 and still pointed to growth in the services sector.
Still, trading was light as investors awaited the Labor Department's August employment report on Friday, which proved disappointing and exacerbated worries about the health of the economy under the weight of a deteriorating housing market and credit market problems.
The Labor Department's report showed that payrolls fell by 4,000 in August, the first decline since August 2003 and well below analysts' expectations of a gain of 110,000, while the unemployment rate held steady at 4.6% as expected. The negative impact of the payrolls number was exacerbated by the downward revision to both the June and July numbers totaling 81K. The other components of the jobs related data, average work week and hourly earnings, were in line with expectations and had little impact.
The major averages plummeted in the wake of the report, with the Dow Jones industrials falling nearly 250 points, or 1.87%, during Friday's session. The broader S&P 500 index fell 25 points, or 1.69%, while the Nasdaq composite index declined 49 points, or 1.86%.
For Investors, the report provided further insight into the economy's performance in August amid persisting weakness in the housing market and turmoil in the credit markets, triggered by the meltdown in the sub-prime lending industry.
The soft trend in payrolls probably reflects business caution given the turmoil in the financial markets, but in our opinion does not signal a recession. The payroll trend is clearly weak, but even flat payroll growth correlates to 2% real GDP growth given the long-term trend of 2% productivity growth. Weaker economic growth is of concern, but the weak payroll number will increase expectations that the Fed will lower interest rates at the September 18 FOMC meeting. It provides additional cover for the Fed to take that action.
| Index | Started Week | Ended Week | Change | % Change | YTD |
| DJIA | 13357.74 | 13113.38 | -244.36 | -1.8 % | 5.2 % |
| Nasdaq | 2596.36 | 2565.7 | -30.66 | -1.2 % | 6.2 % |
| S&P 500 | 1473.99 | 1453.55 | -20.44 | -1.4 % | 2.5 % |
| Russell 2000 | 792.86 | 775.78 | -17.08 | -2.2 % | -1.5 % |
By Anchalee Worrachate
Sept. 5 (Bloomberg) -- The rate banks charge each other to